Fujita & Catymag, I am curious about the file size. This updated package (369 MB) is a bit over half the size of the earlier version (610 MB). Does this mean the newer file has less information in its maps? Wouldn't we be better off keeping the older package?Originally Posted by catymag
Best regards!
Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Likes: 0
Results 11 to 20 of 76
-
24th June 2010, 07:21 PM #11Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Brazil
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 5
- Rep Power
- 0
Downloaded and tested, it seems that improved as well, I'll take one road and then leave more comments
-
24th June 2010, 08:04 PM #12VIP Master
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Brasilia
- Age
- 55
- Posts
- 9
- Rep Power
- 0
Last edited by Poobah; 24th June 2010 at 08:32 PM.
-
24th June 2010, 11:44 PM #13Member +
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Brazil
- Posts
- 28
- Rep Power
- 16
Actually the file (uncompressed) has 629.008Kb. Originally Posted by Poobah
Sorry for my bad English...
-
25th June 2010, 08:43 PM #14VIP Master
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Brasilia
- Age
- 55
- Posts
- 9
- Rep Power
- 0
After we have downloaded both parts, what procedure should we follow in order to join both files into one img file? The downloaded files don't have recognizable extensions. Originally Posted by fujita
-
25th June 2010, 10:24 PM #15Global Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- EU
- Posts
- 1,066
- Rep Power
- 2746
This are two parts of one 7-zip archive. Get 7-zip program (free) (I think it can be done with WinRar too) and select file .001, select extract, and follow instructions Originally Posted by Poobah
NO THANKS POSTS ALLOWED, NO LIKES NEEDED, ALL MIRRORS APPRECIATED
-
26th June 2010, 11:25 PM #16Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Belo Horizonte, Brasil
- Age
- 32
- Posts
- 2
- Rep Power
- 0
thanks, i was sure, that I'll find this maps here
-
29th June 2010, 01:15 AM #17Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Sao Paulo
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 8
- Rep Power
- 0
Hi there,
Could someone explain how those 3 maps work. Whats the difference between them? (CNBR NT 2011.10 + TRC-BR 10.06 + Autoguia 2.24)
I understand i should use only one map at a time, so whats the best occasion for each ??
ThanksLast edited by dupss; 29th June 2010 at 02:22 AM.
-
29th June 2010, 03:53 PM #18Master
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Santana de Parnaiba
- Posts
- 76
- Rep Power
- 184
dupss,
it depends on where youŽll be at. Autoguia has the best coverage but is pretty bad in routing, TRC is good for routing between cities on highways but covers few cities and is poor in POIs, CNBR is average and is good for finding addresses in major cities and features lots of POIs.
-
29th June 2010, 09:55 PM #19Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Brazil
- Age
- 34
- Posts
- 17
- Rep Power
- 0
Is there any POI'S update after that:
POIŽs; Brazil Speedcam 16/June/2010 (whole country): [h t t p : // w w w.4shared.com/file/20973751...oigpi_wav.html
-
30th June 2010, 01:38 AM #20Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Brazil
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 13
- Rep Power
- 0
Junnior The file link that you requested is not valid.
Bookmarks